The reason for this post is simple: I am not sure if there is a way to report discrepancies to Agile Alliance (@agilealliance) on it’s site – especially for the #Agile2017 program.
It is an attempt to collect these issues reported/observed, a running backlog and not any criticism. After all, I am a part of volunteer in #Agile2017 and want to make it the BEST conference ever.
Thanks to Dave Rooney, Chet Hendrickson and conversations on twitter, here’s the comparison:
- The tracks listed on the main site (with their definitions), do not match the options available on the proposal submission page.
| Track available on main page | Is this track available on submissions page? |
| Agile Companies
| Yes (Under – Process at Scale) |
| Agile Foundations
| No |
| Audacious Salon
| No |
| Coaching & Mentoring
| Yes (Under – People) |
| Collaboration Culture & Teams
| Yes (Under – People) |
| Customers & Products
| Yes (Under – Process at Scale) |
| Development Practices & Craftsmanship
| Yes (Under – Technical) |
| DevOps | Yes (Under – Technical) |
| Enterprise Agile | Yes (Under – Process at Scale) |
| Experience Reports | Yes (Independent Category) |
| Leadership | Yes (Under – People) |
| Learning | Yes (Under – People) |
| Project, Program & Portfolio Management
| Yes (Under – Process at Scale) |
| Stalwarts
| No |
| Testing & Quality
| Yes (Under – Technical) |
| The Future of Agile Software Development (IEEE Software)
| Yes (Under – Miscellaneous) |
| User Experience
| Yes (Under – Technical) |
In addition to this post, I have used the contact us form on Agile Alliance site to report the issue. Hoping this gets fixed soon.
If you see any such issues, please feel free to share on twitter using #Agile2017 tag, Comment here or @ me!
The tracks not on the submission system are invitation-only.